Talk:Catch Me Who Can

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Jackiespeel in topic Replica

Site of Trevithick's railway circle

edit

Recent evidence points to it having been in Bloomsbury at a site now occupied by the Chadwick Building (opposite University Street, previously Carmarthen Street), part of University College London, Gower Street. See the discussion page of Richard Trevithick article on the topic of the railway circle site. 15 July 2007

Fake Picture

edit

The August 2008 issue of The Railway Magazine (page 7) reports that the image used in this article is a fake made in the 20th Century. Should the image be removed from this article and replaced with something else or should it be left for illustrative purposes?

Your opinions pleaseGrizzlyqi (talk) 17:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Warning notice added to the "illustration" summary notes. 30 July 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.97.156 (talk) 10:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Catch Me Who Can. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Engineering Timelines

edit

It appears that the Engineering Timelines website has dissappeared. It's unclear if this is a temporary or a permanent loss. A great deal of this article is sourced from that website. I can't even tell if its a reliable source or not. I'll continue to check to see if the website comes back. If it doesn't we'll have to find different references for much of the article's contents. Railfan23 (talk) 20:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rewrite

edit

The artice is now so badly compromised by poor quality writing it needs a thorough edit for style and accuracy. More recent content appears to rely excessively on Francis Trevithick's notoriously unreliable biography. This is despite the extensive clean-up work done last autumn by Railfan23. I have changed the template accordingly. Globbet (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I appreciate the complement. I agree there is more work to be done on the writing style, it might even be worth starting over from scratch and creating a new draft of the article. Railfan23 (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Replica

edit

Can someone 'train orientated' update the section - according to the website 'further developments are imminent.' Jackiespeel (talk) 10:12, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply