Talk:Case competition

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Drmies in topic Case Competitions and Notability

More info edit

There's not a lot of definition of this in Google News, but there's lots of references to it without defining it, arguing that it's a well-known concept in the field.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Changes to Case competition edit

I am a business presentation coach and management professor at the LeBow College of Business at Drexel University. Case competitions are a staple of every business school and I have expanded the entry to include much new information. Whether this constitutes COI is up for grabs. 71.225.138.229 (talk) 15:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

71.225.138.229 (talk) 14:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't see any COI in that. You haven't advertised your college or uni in any way. I've removed the COI tag, which wasn't helping anything to happen that needed to happen. Thanks for contributing your knowledge. --Stfg (talk) 14:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tags edit

It seems like the tags almost take up more space than the article. Maybe someone can add some more information or decide how to shorten the lead, adding to the body? Coralshin (talk) 19:34, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Several are out of date by now, and I've removed them. One or two others aren't strictly out of date, but would automatically be covered by a decent copy edit, and the GOCE September drive is very likely to reach this article. --Stfg (talk) 14:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Case competition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Case Competitions and Notability edit

We should be discussing on a case-by-case basis which case competitions are sufficiently notable to merit inclusion in the article and to make CoS correction. The article clearly benefits from having a list of all (notable) international case competitions - probably one of the driving factors for why most readers visit the article. I'll begin working on this pronto, as opposed to deleting the list en masse. FlipandFlopped 01:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • User:Flipandflopped, *lesigh*. We don't make article content or judge based on clicks, and your conjecture about why a couple dozen editors look at this article is just conjecture. This article has been tagged since 2011, and for a good reason: an article on case competition shouldn't have a list of case competitions just because they are case competitions. None of them are properly sourced, and in fact not a damn thing in the article is properly sourced: there isn't a single secondary, independent source for any of it. You said, "many of which were accompanied by citations to notable source coverage"--that's crap. "Notable source coverage" doesn't mean anything in the first place, and no, none of these were verified by proper sources. Two of the most recent contributors/edit warriors are SPAs, and you, at the very least you could have had the decency to remove the blatant MoS violations. Drmies (talk) 04:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply