Talk:Carrefour de l'Estrie

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved per naming policy. No discussion necessary. Mindmatrix 12:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

Carrefour de L'Estrie → Carrefour de l'Estrie — This article is propose for renaming to Carrefour de l'Estrie. I wanted to move the article and there was an error that the move is not working. On the main article there is an small "l" to make the word "l'Estrie" and this is to match the French Wikipedia article. The French Wikipedia main article says "l'Estrie" to make the title "Carrefour de l'Estrie". And this title should be renamed to match the French Wikipedia Main article. - Steam5 (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support per nominator. Steam5 (talk) 06:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• Neutral the owner's English-langauge website uses the capital "L" 76.66.203.200 (talk) 07:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment - This article is to match the French Wikipedia article. Also, there is a small "l" on this article. Steam5 (talk) 18:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

• For what it's worth, correct capitalization rules for French names support the move; l' is merely a contraction of the definite article "le" or "la", and just means "the" (which isn't capitalized in English, either, if it's in the middle of the title). And per WP:CANSTYLE, the rule is that when we are using a French-language title instead of an English one on a Quebec-related article, we use the correct French spelling. That said, the fact that it's the title of the article on fr: isn't directly relevant to the decision, except insofar as it's a reflection of the same rule being applied there. That said, the only reason the move didn't work for Steam5 is that there's already a redirect with an edit history from the correct spelling to this one — meaning that the process of moving a page overtop of the existing redirect is, in a strictly technical sense, a deletion of the redirect, and thus requires admin rights. I'm going to go ahead and move the page; debate isn't really necessary on a straight spelling correction. Bearcat (talk) 06:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carrefour de l'Estrie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080308145941/http://www.redcliffrealty.com:80/leasing/property_highlights.cfm?property_PK=280 to http://www.redcliffrealty.com/leasing/property_highlights.cfm?property_PK=280

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)