Talk:Carnegie Ridge

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Is this feature larger?

edit
File: Cratons West Gondwana.svg
Between the Guiana Shield and the Brazilian Shield there is a lineament: the Galapagos, the Carnegie Ridge, the Amazon River estuary and trench, St. Paul trench, Romanche Trench, Niger River estuary, Benue Trench (Gansser, Augusto (1973). "Orogene Entwicklung in den Anden, im Himalaja und den Alpen: ein Vergleich". Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae (in German). 66. Lausanne: 23–40.).
São Luís do Maranhão and Ghana have the Equatorial Atlantic flood basalts.
It's the border between the North and the Central Volcanic Zone, let's see if I find something more recent.
--Chris.urs-o (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
--Chris.urs-o (talk) 19:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I don't think that it's likely to be bigger, more likely to be smaller as it says in the article, possibly only 60 km of subducted ridge. Its suggested origin as the track of the Galapagos hotspot would also argue against that possibility. Mikenorton (talk) 18:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Also the Galapagos hotspot is just 20 million years old according to some, whereas the Equatorial Atlantic flood basalts are part of the Jurassic CAMP. James Pindell assumes that the hotspot is older, and was sited in the Caribbean during the Late Cretaceous, causing the anomalous thickened crust of the Caribbean Plateau (see his Fig. 14) [1]. Mikenorton (talk) 19:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
CAMP begins at: 190-180 Ma, Equatorial Atlantic flood basalts at 89 Ma. It is difficult to sort out this jungle. The evolution of the South Atlantic can be seen here 3 I want to read ur refs (Plate Tectonics, driving force) first, after I'll look if the Amazon flows through a trough ;)
--Chris.urs-o (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
--Chris.urs-o (talk) 02:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
OK, I got the wrong LIP, the Equatorial Atlantic flood basalts are mainly about 120 Ma, although with some activity in the Benue Trough continuing until 68 Ma, with the main magmatism associated with the final break-up of South America from Africa according to this [2]. Mikenorton (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
File:Carnegie Ridge.png shows the border of the Nazca and Cocos Plate different to here 4. If ur red lines are a spreading ridge then the Amazon is more a sea than a river. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Chris, plate boundaries were taken from Gutscher et al. 1999, and I'm struggling to see any differences with those shown in your link. Also you've lost me completely with your comment about the Amazon. Mikenorton (talk) 09:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sorry ;) File:Cocos-Caribbean.jpg shows the spreading ridge going North, ur picture seem ok, my fault. And there is an inactive rift between the Guiana Shield and the Amazonian Shield, that's why the note on Amazon. (Zandt, George (Spring 2002). "Orogenic Systems: The Andes". University of Arizona., see figure 1 and 19.) I saw u uploaded twice ur picture on commons, take care, purge the browser history, the thumbs seem to live longer on commons. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 09:34, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carnegie Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply