Talk:Carl Zeiss

Edited for Clairity

In the intro the line: "...large aperture range that allowed for very clear images" allows for confusion because a large aperture range allows for brighter images, where a small aperture range lends itself to sharper images. Digitalsmear (talk) 20:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

'Collaborated together'

I'm going to remove the word 'together', since it's redundant.

Removed two 404 links.

As above. Links are here if anyone wants them:

• Carl Zeiss Jena Lenses
• Sample photos taken with Carl Zeiss Lenses

ĞavinŤing 13:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

They're not 404 anymore so we might need to put them back. Does anyone remember where they were? Occamsrazorwit (talk) 18:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

k for karl

did he ever spell his name with a k or do i have a cheap chinese rip off telescope could someone help with this ty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.228.109 (talk) 05:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carl Zeiss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110703091230/http://www.zeissmicroscopes.org:80/ to http://www.zeissmicroscopes.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Translating the German article

I would like to translate the German language article for Carl for the English entry. I have read the German entry and most of the sources cited there and it looks like a very good entry. Are there any objections before I start translation work? Thanks MikroSammler (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Translated with additions and edits from the German. Additional work needed: Specific references. I will prefer references to the two English sources first, then to the German if necessary. This is a first effort, so please be patient. MikroSammler (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Article issues

This article is associated with five projects, and has been prematurely elevated to B-class. It has a lack of inline citations, one maintenance tag, and a "may be expanded" tag. I notice the "Translating the German article" above and the "please be patient" request but the fundamentals of sourcing and text source integrity, as well as other policies and guidelines, lay the foundation for the criteria for article classification. As presented, it would be argumentative to raise above "Start-class", certainly not above C-class (which may have been bot assisted), with such issues. I am going to try to look at the sourcing to see if I can integrate any but someone more able to work with the language (translation) would be more suitable for the task. IF not this article needs to be demoted, and tagged, until such issues are resolved. Thank you, Otr500 (talk) 10:37, 29 September 2018 (UTC)