 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
8 October 2008 edit
Keep the page it is a good page writened by a good user!(Timmy Appo (talk) 22:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC))
- Except it doesn't show how the character is significant and cites no reliable sources, so it fails both notability and verifiability. —C.Fred (talk) 22:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Episode reviews of possible usefulness edit
- "The Deserter"
- "The General"
- "Plan of Dissent"
- "Carnage of Krell"
- "Kidnapped"
- "The Lost Commanders"
- "Relics of the Old Republic"
- Other stuff
Plunking down reviews so that they could be incorporated into the article at a later date. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 20:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry edit
@TenTonParasol sorry about the pointless edit, thanks for reverting it. I still hadn't seen that it had been reverted by the time I made my second edit. It's ok if that edit gets reverted too. LonelyHorse9 (talk) 01:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- It's alright! There's a lot of guidelines about over-detailed information and fancruft (see WP:FANCRUFT), and it's difficult to really get a grasp on it at first. I believe your addition of the image is a good move, though, and I've re-added it back in after sorting out the licensing information. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 01:44, 24 April 2019 (UTC)