 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
It seems to me that there are some severe errors in this article at the moment. First, the picture doesn't show the Cape Saint Vincent, but the Ponta del Sangres close by, and secondly the license of the picture is reported to be wrong.
Also the article begins with telling that Cape Saint Vincent also is called Cape del Sangres. The truth seems to be that they are different points on the Faros peninsula: MSN-map of the place
As the geographical data are mixed up, the information about the history of the place may also be unreliable, concerning exactly which site they refere to. I don't have the knowledge or access to proper sources myself to correct these things, but somebody perhaps have visited the place? Islander(Scandinavia) 13:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Now it all seem to be in order, thanks to JoJan, since beginning of december. -Islander(Scandinavia) 09:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Correction needed
The article states that in 1641 the naval battle between the Dutch and Spanish was won by the Spanish. The corresponding Wikipedia article however states that the Dutch lost 2 ships and 100 men, but the Spanish lost 2 ships and 1000 men, retreated to Cadiz and leaving the cape to the Dutch.
Herman-I (talk) 09:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Since nobody responded to my plead above, today I corrected the article.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cape St. Vincent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160818075259/http://www.monumentos.pt/Site/APP_PagesUser/SIPA.aspx?id=16894 to http://www.monumentos.pt/Site/APP_PagesUser/SIPA.aspx?id=16894
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)