Talk:Cambridge Energy Research Associates
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Skyemoor in topic Sources
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rigor
editLet's bump this article up out of stub class. First, we need to support the claims made by WP about CERA. There are many predictions made, and many of them did not pan out.
Second, we need to maintain a good encyclopedic writing style, so "sell his soul" type comments need to be couched in terms that can be verified by other sources. Skyemoor 14:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Sources
editI'll start the ball rolling. Here's one source (and more pages at the same site); http://www.energybulletin.net/18111.html --Skyemoor 14:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
best wikipedia table ever!
edithahaha love it. maybe wrong should be capitalized though.