Talk:California State Route 247

Classification

Does anyone know anything about the history of this road? Then the stub could be removed.--Rschen7754 19:34, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Well, you're an idiot and should have looked at the state law. --Rschen7754 06:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 247/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   • You should indicate that the portion of SR 247 between SR 62 and Lucerne Valley runs through deserts (you do further along in the route description).
   • " In 2001, Caltrans indicated that most of the highway was considered "maintain only" until 2020", what is "maintain only" supposed to mean? Should clarify here.

   • It means that it should only be maintained; I think it's clear enough. --Rschen7754 01:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

A couple small issues to be addressed, but otherwise good. Will put on hold. Dough4872 01:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Replied. --Rschen7754 01:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

And I will pass the article. Dough4872 02:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)