Talk:Cairo Citadel

Untitled

Uh, it says "it's sometimes referred to as the Mohamed Ali Citadel, because it contains the mosque of Mohamed Ali, which was built amost 7 centuries later." Seven centuries later than what? It never says when it was originally built, and therefore it's baffling to consider what the "7 centuries later" could be referring to. Hmmmmm382 01:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

A good point, which I have addressed.(Charles 19:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC))

Romanization needed

Romanization of قلعة صلاح الدين needed in lead. Badagnani (talk) 01:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cairo Citadel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060207144945/http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.tcl?site_id=2080 to http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.tcl?site_id=2080
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070512215018/http://www.cairocitadel.gov.eg/main.html to http://www.cairocitadel.gov.eg/main.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060613004257/http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.tcl?site_id=2 to http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.tcl?site_id=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• The Citadel, Cheap Holidays To Egypt - panoramio.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Revisions (history mostly)

I've just expanded the history section significantly. I have done so with the intention of preserving the existing content and adding to it. Some further editing will surely be needed to refine it. Among other concerns, much of the new text may dwell too long on describing former structures within the Citadel (many of which are historically important, however); I'm open to the idea that new sections could be made for these buildings (not to mention new pages).

It's also heavy on architectural history in general; it could use some more information on major events. Also, some information about what the site of the Citadel is currently used for (tourism, culture, military) might be helpful. Cheers, Casual Builder (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks alot, just incredible! JahlilMA (talk) 12:18, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Further note, in case it elicits discussion: I'm removing the "Gallery" section but moving some of the images from it to the main text in spots where they might be relevant. Removing galleries has been contentious elsewhere, but my interpretation of the wikipedia guidelines is that image galleries aren't very desirable unless they're adding some kind of information that helps people learn more about the topic (through visual means). Illustrating different areas of the Citadel, for example, would be good, but there's already some of that in the main body of the page. I hope this makes the page cleaner but also open to being wrong! Casual Builder (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)