 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
 | The article CSS Manassas (clipper) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 4 January 2024 with a consensus to merge the content into CSS Manassas. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}. |
Assessment
editThis article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as start-class based on its WP:MILHIST assessment. HausTalk 23:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Found by National Underwater and Marine Agency?
editThe Clive Cussler article states that The Manassas was found by NUMA. Perhaps if someone can find a reliable reference this article can be expanded to include this information. OlEnglish (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Incorrect image
editThe image of Manassas that is used in the article is incorrect. Manassas had two stacks, not one. Hearn (Capture of New Orleans, 1862, p. 68.) emphasizes this point. I would put in a different image, but the only correct one I have seen is subject to copyright restrictions. Perhaps someone else can find (or create) a better picture. PKKloeppel (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Tone
editIt is interesting to read the description of this ship vs. the description of the USS Mississippi and George Dewey's wiki entry. The engagement between the Manassas and the Mississippi seems to be somewhat different in tone and different points of view depending on which ship you are reading about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.215.84 (talk) 14:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)