Talk:CREW and National Security Archive v. Trump and EOP

Donald Trump Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Name Change Proposal edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

While CREW and NSA v. Trump and EOP seems likely to cause confusion, it is more accurate than the current title. By the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiffs get one free pass to file an Amended Complaint (possibly adding more plaintiffs/defendants) prior to appearance of defendant. So maybe best to hold off on article name change until the August 21, 2017 deadline passes. Dakleman (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Dakleman: The new title is long and it sucks, but it does not confuse National Security Archive with NSA or the case with CREW v. Trump. We'll see if they change the name later. Rhadow (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Rhadow: I can live with this, at least for now. Dakleman (talk) 16:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Missing the ruling by the Appeals Court edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It appears that this article is missing the ruling of the Appeals Court:

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/crew-apps.pdf

The status of the lawsuit is still referred to as "Pending (filed June 22, 2017)" which appears to be incorrect. CrazyPredictor (talk) 12:49, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic