Talk:C9 League

Beijing and Shanghai

Beijing and Shanghai are seperately listed in the article for two reasons. 1. Beijing and Shanghai are the municipalities of China, not belonging to any province. 2. There are two universities involved in C9 League in these two cities. Other cities has only one. --Poppopsun (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

universities rank

The universities are ranked in alphabetical order. --Poppopsun (talk) 21:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

• To Haleghe: Please do not rank your university in the first place. It's an unfair and improper edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poppopsun (talk • contribs) 19:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

years founded

I've added the dates of foundation back. A prior edit removed them under the guise that they were redundant. Under that logic though the municipalities should also be removed. Most other articles involving universities also include the dates in the charts. 219.76.231.209 (talk) 04:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Drew An example being http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Thirteen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.76.231.209 (talk) 05:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I've readded back the dates of foundation. To the person removing the dates stating they were redundant, other articles detailing university groups such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_league or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Thirteen . Please discuss before removing the dates again. 219.76.231.209 (talk) 01:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Drew

File:C9shields.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:C9shields.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:57, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Avoid Peacock Terms. All Statements Must Be Factual and Verifiable

This article contains a number of statements that appear as mere praise. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a promotional website. All information must be factual and free from bias. All facts must verifiable. Wikipedia is not the place to share your point of view, opinion or original research.

Please contribute in the spirit of Wikipedia. Otherwise, we'll have to remove your contributions.

TippTopp (talk) 23:40, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

- Please refer to Project 985 and other articles. Some things you do not know are common sense to Chinese. Poppopsun (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, "common sense" is not a verifiable source. What is "common sense" to you may be unacceptable to someone else. Wikipedia requires that all facts are verifiable. Thank you for accepting this principle.TippTopp (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:05, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Analogies

Is C9 really analogous to the Russell Group, for example? C9 was set up by the Chinese government explicitly to fund the best universities of China and promote Chinese research. The Russell group was set up by the universities themselves to lobby the British government on behalf of the larger universities in the UK. It is not a league table, and among the things they have lobbied for are higher student fees and exemption form freedom of information requests. Furthermore, the 1994 group of smaller universities outperform the Russell Group, with the exception of Oxbridge and Imperial. Triangl (talk) 08:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on C9 League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120805225932/http://xjtunews.xjtu.edu.cn/zhxw/2009-10/1255091987d24517.shtml to http://xjtunews.xjtu.edu.cn/zhxw/2009-10/1255091987d24517.shtml
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120805225932/http://xjtunews.xjtu.edu.cn/zhxw/2009-10/1255091987d24517.shtml to http://xjtunews.xjtu.edu.cn/zhxw/2009-10/1255091987d24517.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)