This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Said "objective language," in the description of my change, meant to say "subjective language" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.27.248 (talk) 03:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Don't think that "International Embarrassment" is the correct term either in terms of ethics or public reception. At face value it would seem to be no worse than the typical dives that we see week in and out, with the exception that this did not involve a possible penalty kick. Some (with which I do not agree), have even praised his "originality" and "inventiveness". Changed wording of section accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.239.130.87 (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
