Talk:Bruges Garter Book

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Original research tag edit

This article was entirely created by now-retired User:Lobsterthermidor. As explained here, his contributions, though well-intentioned, were problematical due to the persistent integration of original research among the referenced parts, making it very difficult to disentangle the reliable content from his own interpretations, speculation, personal opinions and comments.

Until this issue can be resolved, readers should treat the article with caution and should do their own research to verify any information they take from here.  —SMALLJIM  12:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, the banners above the Knights appear to be French, rather than Latin, since roy (modern: roi) and comte would be rex and comes, respectively (meaning king and count in English). This gives me a pause in thought to the statement in the article that the book is in Latin; as, I believe, in the era which the book was made, French was favoured by the English court & nobles. Imperator Talk 15:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bruges Garter Book. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply