Talk:Broad River (Carolinas)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Geo Swan in topic Questionable...

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Broad River (Carolinas). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Questionable... edit

This article contains the same unreferenced claim that I addressed in Talk:French Broad River#Questionable... - namely that the French Broad River flowed into New France. New France, in theory a very large territory, was very lightly settled, and I question whether there had ever been any French colonization anywhere near North Carolina.

French refugees, fleeing religious persecution, did settle in the Carolinas circa 1625. It suggests an alternate explanation for the river's name.

Neither theory belongs in article space without valid RS. Geo Swan (talk) 17:36, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply