Talk:British Rail Class 357

357028

Can someone explain why this unit has been sent to the Czech Republic? Are they considering buying Electrostars, is work being done on it there, or something else? David Arthur 18:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

class 170

is it me, or do these look like British Rail Class 170's? ACBest 19:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

It’s not a coincidence: the 168, 170, 357, 375, 376, 377, and the upcoming 378 all form one family of trains from Bombardier. The 357, in particular, uses the same body shell as the 170 and later 168s. David Arthur 23:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Announcement Systems

Is there any reason in comparing them on these units to the PIS onboard the SPT 334s? They ae not in the same TOC, not controlled by the same parent company and are not in the same family of units as the electrostar. It seems odd to say: "Unlike the class 334s..." when the 334s have very little in common with 357s.

Should this be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.75.55 (talk) 23:29, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Internet forums such as http://www.consumerdeals.co.uk/ are not reliable sources and need to be replaced. MRSC (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Possible change to the title of this article

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avicennasis (talk • contribs) 18:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Train names

It's important to check that these are the people that are linked to. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on British Rail Class 357. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101129064605/http://nationalexpressgroup.com/nx1/media/news/corp_news/pr2006/2006-11-09/ to http://www.nationalexpressgroup.com/nx1/media/news/corp_news/pr2006/2006-11-09/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726060757/http://www.railwayscene.co.uk/showthread.php?thread=2096 to http://www.railwayscene.co.uk/showthread.php?thread=2096
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726060852/http://www.railwayscene.co.uk/showthread.php?thread=2661 to http://www.railwayscene.co.uk/showthread.php?thread=2661

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Seems OK Dr Sludge (talk) 07:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Build date

The class 357/0s entered service 1999-01 The 357/2s 2001-02 and did you know some class 357/2s have been converted as 357/3s 2A01:4B00:854C:2A00:DF3:A71B:AC35:B0D6 (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

As has been mentioned to you on other pages, references to reliable sources are needed.- David Biddulph (talk) 12:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)