A fact from Brihajjabala Upanishad appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Congratulations on making it to today's listing on the "Did You Know..." section of Wikipedia Main Page. The process of making it the listing takes a bit of effort and involves the quick cooperation of many editors. All involved deserve recognition, appreciation, thanks and applause.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Redtigerxyz: Please reconsider the image, as the one you added back illustrates ash smearing but not with Tripundra (it is a different forehead mark). It does not represent what is described in the Brihajjabala Upanishad manuscript, per MOS:IMAGES guidelines. The smoking is misleading too, and nothing to do with the Upanishad. We don't have to go back to what I replaced it with, and I am fine with any other image that is representative and illustrative. How about this or this or something else? I like your idea of one image with ash smearing, but the image should not have an incorrect forehead mark, which Brihajjabala states to be fundamental (see Chatterjee's book page 60). Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 15:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
_(8450517857).jpg){kind=link}
