Talk:Bororo

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Citizen127 in topic Poorly translated

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bororo people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bororo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 3 January 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply



– It's difficult to see a primary topic between the Amerindian ethic group, the African ethnic group, and the language. I'm not sure of the best disambiguator though: Bororo (Amerindian people), Bororo people (South America), or something else? – Uanfala (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose as unnecessary WP:OVERPRECISION. Wodaabe is better at its current title, and pageviews for the dab page indicate no one is getting lost looking for that article. Bororo language is a secondary topic to Bororo. - Station1 (talk) 09:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
    • The pageviews, unfortunately, don't give us any direct indication of what readers are looking for, but if they show anything, it's that the article about the African ethnic group, which is often known as Bororo, is several times more popular than the article currently occupying the primary title. – Uanfala (talk) 11:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
      • Wodaabe is several times more popular than Bororo, but there is no proposal to change Wodaabe's title to Bororo. Pageviews of the dab page show that no more than 2% of readers landing on Bororo click on the hatnote looking for something else, and that fewer than 0.5% of readers of Wodaabe get to that article through the dab page. Station1 (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
        • In a proposal to rename Wodaabe the relevant question would be "Is the African group more commonly referred to as Wodaabe or as Bororo?". But the question we have here is: "Is Bororo commonly used to refer to the African group?". These two look similar, but mean very different things. My original point was that a non-negligible proportion of readers looking for the African group would be searching using "Bororo". Yes, 2% of readers on Bororo click through to the dab page, but that doesn't really tell us anything about reader searches as the vast majority of that traffic will be coming from links. – Uanfala (talk) 02:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
          • I agree that you are asking the right questions. I disagree with the answer. I see no evidence that any significant number of readers are searching for "Bororo" expecting Wodaabe, certainly not enough to displace the South American Bororo from primary status for that title. Station1 (talk) 05:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • oppose per WP:ETHNICGROUP, not to mention how dated 'Amerindian'—blindlynx (talk) 18:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
i'd be okay with either of those—blindlynx (talk) 03:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per the comments of knowledgeable editor Aymatth2 here. They explained that in the Wodaabe context, "Bororo" or more usually "M'bororo" is a less common term (and something of a slight) that references the fact that they are the Fulani people who her bororo cattle. They pointed out that on Google Books, the South American people dominate searches for "Bororo" and the fact that there were no incoming links to "Bororo" intending Wodaabe, despite the fact that the Wodaabe are the far more numerous group. This makes sense to me, but if the article is moved, I'd favor Bororo (South America) as the title.--Cúchullain t/c 17:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Poorly translated edit

This article seems to be a poor translation from another language. There are so many errors that it is at times unintelligible. For example, "The aldeia (village) is divided into two exogamical half-Exerae and Tugarége-each divided into four clans, consisting of several families. A curious aspect for a people that may sometimes seem primitive is that woman has a very particular role in the concept of Bororo society, and indeed the rule of the offspring predicts that this is matriarchal, and that the infant then receives a name that Join the mother clan," and "The Bororo are a small people in the Amazon rainforest living in the southwest of the Brazilian region of Mato Grosso," and "It's no coincidence that Bororo's homes are traditionally arranged in a circle that will be a kind of spatiotis or patio for them, which will act as the main space of Bororo's life. This square, if so called, is so important that it has given the same name to this group of people as it is within that typical courtyard that the Bororo people concentrates most of the social and spirit-Religious," and "One last interesting thing to consider is that, in mourning, the house becomes a space between the domestic domain and the public-legal domain (as Sylvia Caiuby Novaes observes) since the end of funerals must be destroyed after it has been completely empty throughout the mourning period." Citizen127 (talk) 04:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply