Talk:Borealpox virus

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Schwede66 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Schwede66 (talk) 09:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by WhinyTheYounger (talk). Self-nominated at 01:22, 4 July 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: None required.

Overall:   I've checked the usage of the two most cited sources and have not flagged any concerns about original research or plagiarism. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:09, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Who's 'we'? It's certainly not us. Change '... we are still not exactly sure ...' to '... it remains unclear ...' or similar phrasing without usage of personal pronouns. - Concern addressed. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Would it be possible to replace "we" with "public health authorities" (or just "scientists")? If not, the passive construction is fine. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs)
Yes, that works fine as well. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Struck through old wording. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 19:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
  - Minor issue resolved. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply