![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
rate
editAloha,
The GHC excel file says the peso boliviano replaced the old boliviano at a thousand to one (1:1000) as is given here, but the GHC text entry says it was a hundred to one (1:100). Do we have some source for which is correct? Gecko G 06:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Details
editCan I suggest that the highly detailed information about the coins and banknotes be hived off into two new articles?
Dove1950 (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Eventually, perhaps. The stub has just been expanded (and probably should no longer be called a "stub"). It is still very short and concise. Splitting it too soon would result in a loss of coherence. I would suggest waiting for the addition either of images of all the coins and notes or of even more detail. "Detailed" is a relative concept. Right now, the information on the coins and notes is quite basic. A "highly detailed" account would include much more information on design (face and back), security features, date of release, signatures, serial numbering, etc., etc. Sivasova (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- To me, once we get down to giving catalogue numbers, we've reached the point when we should be dividing the article up, retaining an overview of denominations issued here. I agree it's not a stub any more.
Dove1950 (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- To me, once we get down to giving catalogue numbers, we've reached the point when we should be dividing the article up, retaining an overview of denominations issued here. I agree it's not a stub any more.
Image
editThe image for the Bolivian Peso infobox shows a coin that reads: "centavos 50" but the image description says: "Bolivian peso." One Peso is two 50 centavos, or I'm I just missing something. Darthbots (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)