Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bolivia

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Aymatth2 in topic Project-independent quality assessments
WikiProject Bolivia (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Esilda VillaEdit

I am posting this here in the event project page stalkers might be able to help. I really wanted to write her story for lawyer's month. But she is not on and what I find is tantalizing, but insufficient documentation. This says she passed her legal exams in November 1928.[1] This says she was denied a license to practice because she had not completed the mandatory military service.[2] This says she became Bolivia's first woman lawyer on 22 January 1938.[3] Did it really take her ten years? She was involved in the First Feminist Congress in Bolivia as well.[4] There is a biography, [5] in the archives of La Paz. Anyone want to collaborate on her bio? Please ping me. Thanks! SusunW (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RfC on election/referendum naming formatEdit

An RfC on moving the year from the end to the start of article titles (e.g. South African general election, 2019 to 2019 South African general election) has been reopened for further comment, including on whether a bot could be used move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Proposed change to election/referendum naming format. Cheers, Number 57 15:34, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hardeman, BoliviaEdit

Formation of Hardeman

The Flood of 1968 in a zone of northern Santa Cruz, Bolivia, caused displacement of many people living on small farms. Many of these refugees were sheltered in schools in Montero. The refugees eventually were given land in El Bosque del Niño Perdido, and formed the Colonia Hardeman.

Magisita (talk) 17:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC) Magisita (talk) 13:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notice of RfCEdit

FYI. RfC available for comment:


This is related to Venezuelan politics.

--David Tornheim (talk) 09:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Remove numberings from presidents & vice presidentsEdit

We should follow @Mewulwe:'s lead & remove the numbering from all Bolivian presidents & vice presidents bios articles & related articles. GoodDay (talk) 22:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Content suggestions on Bolivia main pageEdit

There is currently a discussion as a result of content reversals which lacks participants and unfortunately is not very content-specific.
Would be nice to see some (more) opinions concerning the reversed suggestions.
Amaruapu (talk) 23:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Colorado Lake Proposed Delete by Redirect to Laguna ColoradaEdit

The Colorado Lake is a minimal stub and has a number of errors (e.g. wrong department). The full page on the Lake/Laguna is Laguna Colorada so I'd suggest turning Colorado Lake into a redirect. Mentioned on the talk page for Colorado Lake. Unsure about how one starts a discussion for consensus. PsamatheM (talk) 19:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Following discussion with no objections Colorado Lank now "deleted by redirect" following merge into Laguna Colorada PsamatheM (talk) 12:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Featured article candidacy relevant to this projectEdit

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Uturuncu/archive1 is a featured article candidacy relevant to this project. If someone has a review/comments/concerns about the article that are pertinent to this list, post about it on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Uturuncu/archive1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In case anyone reading this is interested...Edit

...Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Uturuncu/archive1 requires more comments/reviews/supports/opposes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:54, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeanine AnezEdit

Which is it? was Jeanine Anez the 66th president of Bolivia? or just an acting president. GoodDay (talk) 16:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Movement for Socialism (Bolivia) listed at Requested movesEdit

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Movement for Socialism (Bolivia) to be moved to Movement for Socialism. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Requested move at Talk:Movement for Socialism#Requested move 8 November 2022Edit

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Movement for Socialism#Requested move 8 November 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:50, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Hernando Siles Reyes#Requested move 17 January 2023Edit

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Hernando Siles Reyes#Requested move 17 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 07:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Review of Simón Bolívar at GAN underway, expect FAC soonEdit

Countrymen~! I have news. After a year of labor, Simón Bolívar is finally undergoing a review at GAN on its road to FAC. At either process (or preferably both) I would appreciate eyes, ears, and commentary. I am aiming to at least be in the process of FAC by 24 July 2023, if not to have TFA by then. 17 December 2023 is my fallback goal, and more likely. I look forward to whatever assistance or guidance anybody watching this page can offer or spare. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 22:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Project-independent quality assessmentsEdit

Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]