Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bolivia

Project page Talk
 Portal WikiProject Peer Review Assessment Task Force 
WikiProject Bolivia
Proposed flag of Bolivia.svg
ShortcutWP:BOLIVIA
CategoryBolivia
PortalLatin America (orthographic projection).svg Latin America
Wikimedia CommonsCommons:Category:Bolivia Bolivia
Parent
project(s)		South America
Project banner template{{WikiProject Bolivia}}
Userbox{{User WikiProject Bolivia}}
CSBRelevant for Countering systemic bias

Welcome to WikiProject Bolivia! This group was formed to better organize articles on Bolivia in a spirit of cooperation.

ScopeEdit

This group includes within its scope all articles related to Bolivia, its cities, geography, transportation, culture, history and so on. It aims to expand Wikipedia's resources on Bolivia in a fair and accurate manner. All of these articles should be contained within the Category:Bolivia or one of its subcategories.

How can you helpEdit

Promote the project
  • Join this project! Add yourself to the list, and add the userbox to your page, to advertise the project to people who happen to pass by.
  • Invite people to the project – drop a note on the user talk page of editors working on Bolivia topics who aren't project members.
  • Consider promoting the project via the Wikipedia Signpost WikiProject desk.
Improve the project
  • Update the project pages, archive clutter, and make use of the latest automation available
  • Consult the WikiProject Guide for ideas
  • Come up with new ones
Use the project


Open TasksEdit

  To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Bolivia: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2022-03-21

 
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

ParticipantsEdit

Active membersEdit

To join WikiProject Bolivia, edit this section and add the Wikitext #{{subst:me}} with your areas of interest to the bottom of the following list of members. Members should also place member identification on their user page.

  1. John Carter 15:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 15:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Rarelibra (talk) 17:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Meister 11:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Lihaas Solely politics I'm afraid. Don't live in the country. (talk) 07:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
  6. MEContreras
  7. Onopearls (t/c)18:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  8. Dentren | Talk 16:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
  9. MacedonianBoy (talk) 23:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
  10. Erebedhel - Talk 06:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
  11. Pursuitknowledge (talk)Here is the article I am working on User:Pursuitknowledge/Alfredo Da Silva a known Bolivian artist.Pursuitknowledge (talk) 23:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
  12. LaNaranja (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Potosi, economy, geography, modern political history.
  13. Mike Atnip (talk) 18:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)I dont know how much I can contribute due to time restraints. Lived in Bolivia almost five years.
  14. Chiton magnificus (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
  15. Carwil (talk) 23:13, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
  16. Boliviahugh (talk) 20:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
  17. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 22:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
  18. kawaii♥bot (talk) 09:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
  19. Antonio Santacruzano Martin (Que que?) 09;55, 11 February, 2014 (UTC)
  20. Caleidoscopic (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  21. Da Drewster (talk) (6/8/15) Creating pages for Liga de Fútbol Profesional Boliviano players yet to have a page.
  22. PsamatheM (talk · contribs) 12:00:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)  Mainly adding photos of Southern Bolivia
  23. Crmoorhead (talk · contribs) 13:32:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC) ; Bolivian current events and popular culture.
  24. Krisgabwoosh (talk · contribs) 00:55:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)  Bolivian political history mainly focused on early/mid-20th century. Lived in Bolivia for 6 years.
  25. ReyAlvarez2 06:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  26. Shari Garland (talk · contribs) 21:54:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)  - translation.

Former membersEdit

Thank you for your help! Please move your username back to the active list when you can participate again.

  1. Buaidh (talk · contribs) 20:41:38, 18 June 2019 (UTC) – WikiProject templates and categories.

Member identificationEdit

Members of WikiProject Bolivia should place one of the following lines of Wikitext on their user page to add it to Category:WikiProject Bolivia members.

Wikitext userbox where used
[[Category:WikiProject Bolivia members]] none linked pages
{{Template:User WikiProject Bolivia}}
 This user is a member of
WikiProject Bolivia.
 linked pages
{{Template:User WP Bolivia}}
 This user is a member of
WikiProject Bolivia.
 linked pages
{{Template:User WP Bolivia|invite}}
 This user invites you to join
WikiProject Bolivia.
 linked pages

For other Bolivia user templates, see Category:Bolivia user templates.

Quality ScaleEdit

See the Assessment department for more information!

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
  FA  The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. None
  FL  The article has attained featured list status.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)
  A  The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. None
  GA  The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the good article criteria:

A good article is:

  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Jesuit Missions of Chiquitos
  B  The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Hispanic
  C  The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing
(as of June 2018)
  Start  An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Capinota
  Stub  A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues.
More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; however, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.
 Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Yacuma Province
  List  Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of newspapers in Bolivia

Recognized contentEdit

Bolivia articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
  FA 1 1
  FM 6 6
  GA 1 2 5 12 4 24
B 5 11 35 16 9 76
C 14 26 57 72 31 200
Start 23 32 159 296 4 231 745
Stub 4 14 90 2,052 35 1,159 3,354
List 4 10 6 70 20 110
Category 1 1,982 1,983
Disambig 2 2
File 58 58
Portal 36 36
Project 1 6 7
Redirect 3 52 55
Template 1 1 1 183 186
Other 7 7
Assessed 52 96 354 2,523 2,371 1,454 6,850
Unassessed 1 188 189
Total 52 96 354 2,524 2,371 1,642 7,039
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 24,925 Ω = 5.66

Featured articlesEdit

Former featured articlesEdit

Good articlesEdit

Did you know? articlesEdit

In the News articlesEdit


Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team release version selectionsEdit

TemplatesEdit

Please see {{WikiProject South America}} for assessment information.

What to type What it makes What it's for
{{User WikiProject Bolivia}}
Talk
 This user is a member of
WikiProject Bolivia.
 Please place this on your user page if you are a participant in this WikiProject.
{{User WikiProject Bolivia/CoatBG}}
Talk
 This user is a member of
WikiProject Bolivia.
 
 Alternative userbox with black and gold design and the Coat of Arms as a golden piece.
{{WikiProject Bolivia}}
Talk
WikiProject Bolivia (Rated Project-class)
 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
  Project  This article has been rated as Project-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
Add to the talk page of every article this WikiProject is working on.

RequestsEdit

Image requestsEdit

In addition to posting your image requests here, on the talk page(s) of the subject(s), and on the Wikimedia Commons (Commons:Commons:Picture requests), please also post them at es:Wikipedia:Imágenes solicitadas on the Spanish Wikipedia. If you do not know Spanish, you can ask someone at es:Wikipedia:Embajadas to help you.

New articlesEdit

This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2022-05-22 20:20 (UTC)

Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.

 

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

ToolsEdit

Main tool page: toolserver.org
  • Reflinks - Edits bare references - adds title/dates etc. to bare references
  • Checklinks - Edit and repair external links
  • Dab solver - Quickly resolve ambiguous links.
  • Peer reviewer - Provides hints and suggestion to improving articles.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bolivia&oldid=1081817036"