Talk:Blind Department Building and Dow Hall, State School for the Blind

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Blind Department Building and Dow Hall, State School for the Blind is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

photos

Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Since the notability of the topic of the article is the designation as a Registered Historic Place, and the designation covers both buildings, I think it is appropriate to have a photo of both buildings. For those who think it looks too crowded, you might try changing your default thumbnail size (in preferences).--Appraiser 00:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think we should be asking readers of articles to change their default settings to make articles look good. But as an alternative, is it possible to get a picture where you can see both buildings? That would be ideal. (I don't know if this is a viable option) Martijn Hoekstra 10:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The two black-and-white photos come from the Historic American Buildings Survey, which most likely doesn't have both buildings in one photo. I have a present-day photo of the remains of Dow Hall, but I need to get my friend's approval to upload it under a Creative Commons license. (This shouldn't be a problem, since I told him I wanted photos for Wikipedia.) As far as actually formatting these photos is concerned, we could put in some sort of table after the two text sections of the article, and then everything should look nice. (The "gallery" tag would work, too, but I'm not a big fan of it.) --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 14:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Since Dow Hall no longer exists, the only good photos that I know of that are in the public domain are the ones on HABS. The article looked fine to me, before, on two of my computers, with different screen sizes. Perhaps Martijn Hoekstra was experiencing a browser problem. What was the specific problem you were experiencing? Did the text get covered by the picture?

The article certainly could be expanded in text, which might also solve his problem. I would add more, but the online sources I found don't say much more. Does the Mary Nord book have details that could be added?--Appraiser 15:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nah, it wasn't a browser problem, it was purely cosmetic. At my resolution an thumb size, it just got too cluttered. I'll make you a screenshot to show. Martijn Hoekstra 15:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Here it is. IMO a little overcrowed, but if yall disagree, go ahead and change it. I did the same just based on my oppinion. Martijn Hoekstra 15:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blind Department Building and Dow Hall, State School for the Blind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic