Talk:Blackmail (1929 film)

Fair use rationale for Image:Blackmail1.jpg

Image:Blackmail1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

public domain

I've removed the statement that the film is currently in the Public Domain, as the US Copyright Office lists the film as having it's US rights restored. Davepattern (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyright in U.K. was valid until 1999. When this bill was issued in 1997,copyright was valid, but in 2000, expired. Is this wrong?Mikomaid (talk) 03:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't the European Directive override the older UK law in any case? 81.158.0.164 (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

My understanding (and I'm not a lawyer!) is that EU harmonisation in the 1990s ammended the 1988 UK Act so that copyright for films became dependant upon when the last of the principal creators of the film died (e.g. director, writer, composer, etc). Prior to that, copyright was either 50 or 70 years after the film was originally released (I'd need to double check, but I think it was 50 years up to the 1988 Act, and then 70 years after that). The EU harmonisation was implemented retroactively in the UK, so films that had become PD in the UK fell back under copyright. The new UK copyright is for 70 years after the last principal creator died. So, for Hitchcock films, that means at least 2050 (1980+70). For Blackmail, the writer Charles Bennett died in 1995, so Blackmail should be under copyright until 2065 (1995+70). For further information, see the British Film Institute web site. Davepattern (talk) 06:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

File:Anny Ondra.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Anny Ondra.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 29 October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status of other Hitchcock films not relevant

The statement "Like Hitchcock's other British films, all of which are copyrighted worldwide" is no longer true. The Lodger, a British Hitchcock film, is public domain in the United States. The copyright status of other Hitchcock films is also irrelevant to Blackmail. It also reads like legal copy from the copyright holders and is not very encyclopedic. 98.177.110.153 (talk) 10:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)