Talk:Bishop of Norwich

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Lizthegrey in topic Splendid fellow, but..

Merge edit

I have merged the article Bishop of Norwich, England (Catholic) into this one. I don't claim that my merge was perfect, however, and the article could probably now do with some reorganisation. aliceinlampyland 14:33, 2 March 2006 (UTC).Reply

Splendid fellow, but.. edit

I do like this anecdote..

"In traditional dining circles, when the port is being circulated after dinner it is traditionally considered poor etiquette to ask for the bottle to be passed round should someone be seen to be hogging the decanter. Instead certain groups hold that one should ask if the offending gentleman "knows the Bishop of Norwich" to prompt him to pass it round. (In the unlikely event that the question is taken literally and answered with a "no," the proper next step is to say of the hypothetical bishop: "damn' fine fellow — but he never passes the port!")"

..but I have been trying to find a citation from a reliable source for it. I can find a number of web sites which claim it is "old tradition" but most of these don't give much information and several contradict each other. (hamper.com, infoportwine wineorigins.) In addition, I am not sure they pass WP:RS. I can't find it on the site of a maker of port (even on Sandeman who have an entire page devoted to where the right-to-left thing might have come from) and I can't find in a cursory rummage in the library through the "traditions" and "food and drink" and geography sections. I particularly can't find it in Brewer's Britain & Ireland, which rounds up phrase, fable, tradition, sayings and so on associated with place names. For Norwich, it a ton of things, from Norwich FC's association with Delia Smith to NORWICH ("nickers off ready when..") to the spurious "marytered saint" William of Norwich. The bishop isn't there, though.

I can't prove this is not a tradition, and I find it quite cute myself. But I can't find a cite, so I am moving it to this talk page pending someone finding a reference (or deciding on of the web sites above qualifies).

Telsa (talk) 11:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I assure you it is, having uttered those immortal words myself on occasion! --Wozzy25 (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

This Yahoo! Travel article alludes to the tradition, as well as to a writeup in the The Daily Telegraph. Who's up for a hunt through their archives? --BDD (talk) 19:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I cannot find mention of "port" or "Bagot" in the cited text Memorabilia Cantabrigiae, at least the Google Books & Hathi Trust scanned versions of the original 1803 publication. I believe the quote to be a modern fabrication. lizthegrey (talk) 04:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Last 450 years edit

Should be something on history after 1558! AnonMoos (talk) 12:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bishop of Norwich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply