This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Time to close it! No consensus. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose merge. Very notable ship in its own right (see links to all the other languages). It should be expanded similar to trireme. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:40, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article states that the trireme would not have been significantly faster than the bireme due to added weight but produced other tactical advantages, but provides no examples afterward of what these tactical advantages would have been. Jantill (talk) 13:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The statement that the Greek invented the bireme even before 600 BCE seems at odds with the picture of a fully functional Assyrian bireme dated 700 BCE. So that can only mean biremes are pre 700 and leaves the question where and when are the first biremes build wide open. Perhaps somebody has knowledge of the older use by Assyrian (perhaps Phoenicians, who were Assyrian vassals at that time)? There is always a tendency to give credits to the Greek, but they copied the oversea trading routes/colonies from the Phoenicians and maybe also their ships? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codiv (talk • contribs) 22:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply