Talk:Bioamplifier

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Fu Hung Shiu in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

Assignment not submitted before 11:59:00 UTC Nov 18 grading most recent 11/20

  1. Quality of the information: 2
  2. Article size: 0
    (14,626 bytes) Late and under 15000 bytes
  3. Readability: 1
    Some of the sentence structures are not as fluid
  4. References: 1
    Expert interview is not a published or broadcasted interview and is not a acceptable wikipedia source add more outside citations for the same information to strengthen article
  5. Links: 2
    Link Augustus Waller, Willem Einthoven, capillary electrometer
  6. Responsive to Comments: 1
    Did not link to bioamplification
  7. Formatting: 1
    Unsure if it's necessary to write extensively about ekg, emg, ect. when they have their own pages
  8. Writing: 1
    Change extensibly to extensively, "The Vacuum" vacuum should be lowercase "The electrodes delegates signals to the amplifier unit" should be delegate "skin, specifically, on scalp." should be "the scalp", "Multielectrode" to Multi-electrode
  9. Used Real Name: 2
  10. Is Outstanding in some way: 1
    ok article but not outstanding

Total: (13/20 - penalty for being late)
Jsiemer3 (talk) 21:28, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Grading 11/24 1. Quality of Information: 2
Good information. Specifically liked the history section.
2. Article size:0
Did not submit anything before due date
3. Readability:2
4. Refs:2
has required number of references
5. Links: 2
Links seem okay
6. Responsive to comments:2
Not really applicable
7. Formatting: 2
Like bullet points
8. Writing: 1
You can expand upon electrocardiography, electromyography, electroencephalography after the bullet points. You can also 9. Used Real Name:2
10. Outstanding?:1
To be outstanding I would include a few pictures and tables to better represent content and reach general audience.
Total: (16/20 - penalty for being late)
Jim Schwoebel (talk) 21:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  1. Quality of the information: 2
  2. Article size: 0
    Being very late
  3. Readability: 2
    Looks ok
  4. References: 2
    Using different resources such as books, and articles. Remember to put PMIDs if applicable as Dr. Potter mentioned in the email!
  5. Links: 1
    Augustus Waller, Willem Einthoven, capillary electrometer in history part should be linked. Also sweat glands, sympathetic nervous system, skin conductance should in Galvanic skin response part should be linked. Check again and see is there anything should be linked.
  6. Responsive to Comments: 2
  7. Formatting: 2
    nice bullet points, succinct information.
  8. Writing: 1
    Some minor mistakes as Jsiemer3 mentioned.
  9. Used Real Name: 2
  10. Is Outstanding in some way: 0
    Nice job for introducing this technology, but being late. Deduction for 2 points.

Total: (14/20 - penalty for being late)
Fu Hung Shiu (talk) 22:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Various Sources edit

Output media of a bioamplifier; ie: Various devices or electronic instruments. I could also see it being closly related to bioamplification.