Talk:Billy Boy

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Is there a pipe organ recording of this song? I would love to have one. Oldlover (talk) 03:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Uncle Joe

edit

I've heard a similar song called "Uncle Joe".

Is your horse a single footer, Uncle Joe, Uncle Joe? 76.126.21.16 (talk) 22:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hatnote

edit

Attempts to format and use {{hatnote}} for the notes at the top[1] appear to have now been WP:REVERT (removed completely)[2] with the edit summary "Undid … And they are other "Billy Boys". This is what a disambig page is for.". Presently Old revision of Billy Boy, nor a WP:DISAMBIG page. In this case the {{hatnote}} had been tweaked (1) to consolidate the two separate lines, (2) to note an article name ("BillyBoy*") containing punctuation—punctuation that Google doesn't like matching on—and which, without the punctuation would require an alternative name and additional disambiguation. Would Bgwhite or another editor be able to help offer a suggestion about disambiguating that would move the situation forward positively? —Sladen (talk) 07:58, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sladen, as I mentioned, this is what a disambig page is for. There are more than 3 pages with "Billy Boy". There is no need to list them all on top. Create Billy Boy (disambiguation). Add all the different pages there. Then add {{For}} or another similar template on the top of the appropriate Billy Boy pages.
Also, create a redirect. BillyBoy -> BillyBoy*.
Google doesn't like *, but that doesn't matter in this case. Problem is "BillyBoy" is up against "Billy Boy" in Google searches. People are not just searching for a jewellery designer.
Some Billy Boy's are: Billy Boy, Billy Boy (1954 film), Billy Boy (wrestler), Billy Boys, Willy Use a Billy... Boy, Billy Boy on Poison, Billy Boy Arnold. Hmmm, no Billy Boy condoms. It's a condom brand, but see... Willy Use a Billy... Boy. Bgwhite (talk) 08:29, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Bgwhite thank you, and I concur that a disambiguation page will be a better solution. Would you be willing to perform a self-revert until a disambiguation page is available and the {{hatnote}} can be updated accordingly? —Sladen (talk) 09:40, 2 October 2015 (UTC) Only one of the topics was in the news-media yesterday, so the short-term optimisation and article creation was done around that.Reply
[[User:|Sladen]] It took two minutes to create. Bgwhite (talk) 20:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Billy Boy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply