Talk:Bifascicular block

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Medicine: Cardiology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Bifascicular block.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

note

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Doesn't the ECG show trifascicular block?? Left axis deviation plus first degree heart block plus RBBB ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.173.192 (talk) 16:07, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Image

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The EKG image is of TRIfasicular block - not BIfasicular block. RogerOver (talk) 18:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

There was an image of a bifascicular block near the end of the article, so I used that to replace the trifascicular block in the infobox. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 18:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic