Talk:Bible translations into Vietnamese

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Translation studies Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.Translation studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Translation studiesTemplate:WikiProject Translation studiesTranslation studies articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bible High‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

"policy then of the Jesuit missions" edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

See the article on Bible translations into Japanese. It is noted there that a Jesuit translation of the New Testament into Japanese was produced in 1613. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.38.222 (talk) 10:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The delete of above User was "leading to the first printing of Catholic texts in Vietnamese by the Jesuits in 1651, but not the Bible, ~~as per the policy then of the Jesuit missions~~" which seems a reasonable delete. Though it is something where a bit of historical/regional inconsistency is visible and WP:RS might help explain. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Actually on inspection of the Japanese article it turns out the source was faulty and only Gospel readings for Sunday were produced in Japan in 1613, but all the same that line "as per the policy" can stay deleted. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bible translations into Vietnamese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518163214/http://www.kinhthanhvn.org/viewItem.jhtml?itemId=1404 to http://www.kinhthanhvn.org/viewItem.jhtml?itemId=1404

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic