Talk:Beth Shak

(Redirected from Talk:Beth shak)
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Inquisitivepigeon in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit

Talk: Beth Shak please remove citation 2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inquisitivepigeon (talkcontribs) 06:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Don't delete

edit

This page is simply facts about a well known poker player. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Entertainer123 (talkcontribs) 21:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

How can she be called a pro poker player? Is there any evidence that she actually makes money from it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.47.130 (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edit request from Ruferto1, 26 September 2011

edit

I'm writing on behalf of beth to request her picture be changed to this one: http://bethshak.com/img/pic_86.jpg

She is no longer sponsored by Full-Tilt poker and wishes to have any affiliations with them removed.

Ruferto1 (talk) 01:37, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

The image is not available at the given link. Since this would be a picture of a living person you can upload the picture to the commons and then post it here to get changed in the article. See Wikipedia:Uploading images for more information. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 04:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

References removed

edit

I moved the following from the article as they were added by an editor with a clear WP:COI. I also don't think they are worthy including.

  • Emily Cronin (July 27, 2012). "Emily Cronin". Elle UK. Retrieved July 27, 2012.
  • Kristen Henning (July 25, 2011). "Inside Beth Shak's Louboutin-Filled Closet". Women's Wear Daily. Retrieved July 25, 2011.

The Rambling Man (talk) 13:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Promotional Content

edit

I don't usually use Wikipedia, but reading this page it reads like a brochure more than a Wikipedia page. Sure enough, we had user "Ruferto1" request a photo change above on the subject's behalf and the edit history is littered with edit changes of non-noteworthy facts being added to the article by this user. Again, I don't know Wikipedia, but I'm sure it breaks some sort of conflict of interest or promotional rule. --97.90.68.178 (talk) 00:39, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Beth Shak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Mila Shak

edit

Non-notable. Adam9007 (talk) 02:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Adam9007, I suggest taking this to AfD, I've gone through the other article, and the claims to significance that were originally in the article failed verification by reliable sources. Right now the only thing that is really mergeable in the article is the fundraiser, and that is already in Beth Shak. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Beth Shak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply