Talk:Berlin Brigade

Untitled

The unit listing for the american Berlin Brigade is not complete (a more comprehensive (but still not complete) listing can be found at www.western-allies-berlin.com). Also the french Berlin Brigade is not mentioned at all and the close relationship between these three Brigades which was unique throughout NATO.

we dont need no stinking bages

The US army badge seems to be a bit wrong, is there a source for it. See http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.army.mil/-images/2008/07/13/18744/size2-army.mil-2008-07-08-105638.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.army.mil/-news/2008/07/13/10123-the-transformation-of-a-brigade/index.html&usg=__3X-vEXI7X4iPWLV8xyWeOQM7RZU=&h=276&w=215&sz=50&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=a6rEroKpQPpsVM:&tbnh=114&tbnw=89&prev=/images%3Fq%3DThe%2BBerlin%2BBrigade%2Bsleeve%2Binsignia%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26um%3D1 & http://www.army.mil/-images/2008/07/13/18744/army.mil-2008-07-08-105638.jpg.Slatersteven (talk) 18:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Suggested split up into Berlin Brigade & Berlin Infantry Brigade

Berlin Brigade was the official name of the US-troops in West Berlin. The official name of the UK-troops was Berlin Infantry Brigade for about 27 years of it's existence (see table), that's the majority of time. The UK-troops never been called Berlin Brigade. Therefore I suggest the split up of the article. Joerg, the BajanZindy (talk) 11:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

NOt sure there is really enough material for two artcles. But you might be right. Maybe rename it NATO garrison Berlin and add info about the French brigade..Slatersteven (talk) 13:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I think it would be appropriate to create a separate article for the UK Berlin Infantry Brigade. NATO garrison Berlin is not a correct term. These forces were not part of NATO, they were separate force stationed in Berlin that enjoyed special status as Occupation forces based on an agreement between the allies (US, UK, France and the Soviet Union) at the end of WWII. Ehrentitle (talk) 16:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

actualy they were part of the NATO command. The British brigade being part of BOAR but not part of 1st corps.Slatersteven (talk) 16:36, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I think an appropriate name for a combined (overview-like )article would be Allied Forces in Berlin, that's then all four allies. Regarding the (US) Berlin Brigade, I'd keep the name of the article and regarding more material for an article about the (UK) Berlin Infantry Brigade, I got a couple of books here (e.g. Berlin and the British Ally, 1945-1990), with a good amount of material. For the french Forces Françaises à Berlin, we'd need a french speaker with the book BERLIN Des français au service de la liberté in our round. Joerg. the BajanZindy (talk) 17:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Dead link(s)

The mcnair-museum.de external link was dead today (16 Apr 2013). I am replacing it with a likely-looking link to http://www.mcnair-barracks.us-berlin.com/, but the content of those (from the description of the .de site) is likely to be quite different. BSVulturis (talk) 20:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Berlin Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120619083418/http://www.kameradschaft.248gsu.de:80/ to http://www.kameradschaft.248gsu.de
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101211074209/http://baor-locations.co.uk:80/Berlin.aspx to http://baor-locations.co.uk/Berlin.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Berlin Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722175912/http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/R600_82.PDF to http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/R600_82.PDF
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kameradschaft.248gsu.de/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)