Talk:Ben and Me

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Evope in topic Walt Disney Mini Classics

Fair use rationale for Image:Bendxd.jpg edit

 

Image:Bendxd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re-release edit

According to Rotten Tomatoes, Walt Disney Mini Classics - Ben and Me (1991) (25 minutes). I assume this is a DVD.211.225.34.177 (talk) 09:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Walt Disney Mini Classics edit

Why was this film released in the Walt Disney Mini Classics series? That line is for featurettes which last at least three reels meaning they're too long to be considered a traditional short that is too short to be considered a feature film. This film only lasts 20 minutes long which is less than three reels which at 24-40 minutes long. Speaking of the Walt Disney Mini Classics series, Mickey's Magical World has the running time long enough to make it a feature film. --Evope (talk) 21:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply