This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Belzer v. Bollea is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
A fact from Belzer v. Bollea appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I placed {{sic}} because of the obviously incorrect usage of "paradigm", which, as far as I am concerned, is not used to apply to human beings. Perhaps the writer meant "paragon"? 70.162.235.236 (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Oxford English dictionary defines it as "A typical example or pattern of something", so basically the lawyers were calling him a "typically ungrateful client". The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 23:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
WP:NPOV requires us not to editorialize about how "ironic" it was for Belzer to name a farmhouse. It matters not whether the sources use it, we are not allowed to state such opinions in Wikipedia's voice. 70.162.235.236 (talk) 00:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
That's amusing - per MOS:SCAREQUOTES, now we're going to editorialize by "distancing ourselves" from "ironcically" by putting it in scare quotes? 70.162.235.236 (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
I remember this sentence from having read the article a little while ago. My impression was also that it is nonsensical. Even if it isn't, I don't see how it's relevant: It makes it sound like Bollea's fame was somehow affected by the case. Of course, the IGN source doesn't mention the case. —Alalch E. 09:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
