This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
the current text should be in Central European Initiative not here. these are bilateral relations articles so only reference should be made to multilateral initiatives. LibStar (talk) 12:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
a visit to a third country to see a facility there is hardly an example of bilateral relations. this is the type of barrel scraping from googling country X and Y and trying to insert factoids. LibStar (talk) 12:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I am assuming you are referring to a factoid as an isolated fact. Wikipedia doesn't care if 10 facts come from 1 source or 10 sources. Mathematically they represent the same depth of coverage. Having all 10 facts come from a single source is convenient for the person writing the article, it is much less work. I would say taking 10 facts from 10 sources to generate an article is an example of the best research in Wikipedia. It is what makes Wikipedia useful as an integrated source of information. Anyone can read hundreds, even thousands of concise articles on previously researched topics on the Internet. Wikipedia provides topics that are notable and verifiable and includes ones that have not been previously integrated into a single narrative. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
