Talk:Beam-powered propulsion

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

2007 & 2008

edit

The problem of diffraction and keeping the beam tight over large distances should be quantified. I believe it is something like: BeamDiameter = Wavelength * Range / EmittingAperture. For typical optical frequencies, I think you will find something like 75 kilometer beam diameter divided by meters of aperture, at a distance of 1 AU. For distances on the order of 1 AU, interplanetary distances, this implies a laser with an aperture on the order of kilometers. Someone check my math, please. DonPMitchell 23:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

In the "Direct impulse" section: "His work elaborating on a proposal initially made by Marx." This looks to me like random chaff. I can't find anything backing up a connection to any Marx, but I don't know much about propulsion. Is there anyone who can confirm or deny this line? Avram (talk) 15:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Under "Thermal Propulsion":

The page states that using a laser would give a more efficient method of propelling the ship. It then says this is due to the velocity being proportional to the square root of the temperature. But surely if its an effective proportionality then the velocity should be proportional to the temperature squared. if it was the square root of the temperature then a very high temperature would be needed in comparison to the velocity gained. just a thought. Also I'm doing my A level physics research coursework on the topic of beam powered propulsion so if anyone has any more information let me know. cheers Haydnrobinson (talk) 11:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Space-based beams

edit

What about beams that come from space instead of the ground? There could be solar panels in space as the power source in addition to (in instead of) the ground-based power. I don't have time to find a good reference now but this should be included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spot (talkcontribs) 14:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Beam-powered propulsion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Beam-powered propulsion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beam-powered propulsion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply