Talk:Battle of Stony Point

Evisceration

This article totally eviscerated by severe vandalism that nobody, incl. me, caught. I will restore after incorporating edits made since the vandalism.--Reedmalloy (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Lt. Knox

The "Lt. Henry Knox" mentioned in the article links to Maj. General Henry Knox. Rather positive that this is not the same person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.103.59.63 (talk) 15:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Neutrality

"The British suffered heavy losses in a battle that served as a huge victory in terms of morale for the Continental Army."

I think this observation has POV issues and is of questionably accuracy. Later in the article, it is stated that 20 men British were reported killed. THe speculation over 58 missing is left open. Does this relly represent heavy losses?

I think a "huge victory in terms of morale" might be better put and does look like special pleading, repeated as it is in the introduction and in the body of the article. 'Important' might perhaps be a more proportionate adjective. In any case the morale effect of the action is really subsidiary to its military importance and, I would suggest, is either better discussed in the body of the article or referred to more moderately.JF42 (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

British losses included more than 500 captured, more than 2/3 of the garrison. This is presumably what "heavy losses" refers to. Magic♪piano 16:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Stony Point. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303170924/http://www.revolutionaryday.com/usroute9w/stonypoint/default.htm to http://www.revolutionaryday.com/usroute9w/stonypoint/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Anecdote about King George III's response to Stony Point

I have removed the reference to a story that "asserted that King George III fought back tears when he heard of the "mercy" that had been shown to his troops": which cites the following work: Loprieno, Don, The Enterprise in Contemplation: The Midnight Assault of Stony Point, Heritage Books Inc., 2004, ISBN 0-7884-2574-9, ISBN 978-0-7884-2574-5 (with no page number given). I own a copy of this book and this story definitely does not appear in it. RobJohn1964 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Geography

I have edited down the repetitive text in the final paragraph of this section that relates to the nature of Stony Point as a promontory ("Peninsula").

It may ultimately still require integration into the body of the main text.

JF42 (talk) 09:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)