This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In this article I can see statemenets such as
"... and they turned to their old method for such situations: they bribed the Magyars to attack Bulgaria from the northeast."
which present a pretty strange view of history. Hiring various other nations and tribes to do your dirty work was common. Everyone did this back then. But enough about this example. Maybe this article suffers more from un-encyclopaedic writing than problems in neutrality. Jeltztalk 20:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Then it would be nice if you rewrite it in encyclopaedic style; the information presented is true, so you could do that.
"... and they turned to their old method for such situations: they bribed the Magyars to attack Bulgaria from the northeast." It is written nowhere that this method was evil or tricky: it is normal for every country with smart rulers do take such opportunity if possible, and the Byzantines acted that way many times. --Gligan 10:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply