Talk:Battle of Sammel

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Sammel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101008033218/http://www.worldtimelines.org.uk:80/world/asia/south/AD1526-1757 to http://www.worldtimelines.org.uk/world/asia/south/AD1526-1757
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090826152050/http://www.nimajpalace.com:80/activities.htm to http://www.nimajpalace.com/activities.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Infobox

Per WP:MILMOS#INFOBOX, n particular, terms like "Pyrrhic victory" or "decisive victory" are inappropriate for outcomes. Also, if you're going to add new figures, please ensure the figures are presented as a range taking into account other references already cited, instead of presenting your reference as the only correct one. FDW777 (talk) 10:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Also, considering the existing reference said other references give a range from 4,000-12,000 and the new reference said 5,000-6,000 no actual change is needed, since the new figures are already covered by the existing ones. FDW777 (talk) 10:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Also "Glory of Marwar and glorious Rathores" does not appear to exist. FDW777 (talk) 10:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Once again, we don't use non-standard termino0logy such as Hard-won victory of Afgans. If it was an Afghan victory, which it was, then per WP:MILMOS#INFOBOX it is "Afghan victory". FDW777 (talk) 08:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

@MilitaryGeek634: the existing reference says the Marwar strength was 4,000 cavalry according to some sources and less than 12,000 cavalry and archers according to others, therefore per WP:NPOV it doesn't get changd to just 8,000. FDW777 (talk) 07:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Tone

When Maldev's innocent generals Jaita and Kumpa found out what had happened, they were worried about how they would prove their innocence. When the king ordered withdrawal, they overheard the chat between the village women worried about the Afghan Army. One of the women said we need not to worry as long as Jaita and Kumpa are here to protect us. This statement made the proud chieftains regain their honour is just one example of problematic text in this article. FDW777 (talk) 10:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)