Talk:Battle of Port Royal (1690)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Move Page Proposal
editIsn't this really about a Siege of Port Royal rather than a "Battle" given there was no fighting? I will move the page if there are no comments in the next couple days. --Hantsheroes (talk) 08:08, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Port Royal (1690). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100123091537/http://ns1763.ca:80/annapco/portroyal.html to http://ns1763.ca/annapco/portroyal.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Date discrepancy
editThis article says the battle started on May 19, but King William's War says May 9. Is that perhaps an Old Style and New Style conflict? —howcheng {chat} 20:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Two years later, some courtesy pings for people who seem to have worked on this article: Darrend1967, Hantsheroes, Magicpiano. —howcheng {chat} 01:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)