| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Point 175 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coordinates Please edit
anybody have the exact X,Y,Z of the place? Brian in denver (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Battle of Sidi Rezegh edit
Should this be merged into an article that is basically the Battle of Sidi Rezegh? Shire Lord (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- I wondered but since it's an Italian gig I don't know enough. Do Italian historians call it a battle? Considering how big, long and sprawling Crusader was, merging it will require a lot of pruning or a much longer Sidi Rezegh article. It might be better to break Sid Rezegh down into a main article and a number of sub-articles instead. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- I think a Sizi Rezegh article might be better but yes needs to be worked on. Shire Lord (talk) 14:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- I wondered but since it's an Italian gig I don't know enough. Do Italian historians call it a battle? Considering how big, long and sprawling Crusader was, merging it will require a lot of pruning or a much longer Sidi Rezegh article. It might be better to break Sid Rezegh down into a main article and a number of sub-articles instead. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Move edit
@Asilvering: While I can't complain of you moving the article without discussion just as I did, I think it's a bit precious to do it first when it has stood for so long. I changed the title because it isn't a battle and none of the sources I had at the time called it one. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 22:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Great, please open a WP:RM to discuss! Or just edit the article according to your sources, if it's never ever called "Battle of" and you don't think anyone could possibly argue against it. It may have stood at the title you chose for three months, but it did so without any of the content having been changed to fit. -- asilvering (talk) 02:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Three months? I thought that I did it years ago (!?!) I must have done a drive-by edit after someone else changed something and forgot to clean it up. Thanks for taking the trouble and apols for calling you precious. ;O) I have something else to do first but will try to get it started this week. Keith-264 (talk) 08:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)