Talk:Battle of Đồng Đăng (1979)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Đồng Đăng (1979) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vietnam Tactical victories edit
I laugh when I read that every battle in this conflict is a Vietnamese tactical victory. The fact is China achieved every single one of their objectives and Vietnam suffered many more casualties in each battle. How is this a Vietnam tactical victory? The quantity of Chinese casualties were inflated by the west for years out of embarrassment that the Chinese performed better in Vietnam than what the U.S. and its allies did. Recent Chinese records indicate that they had far fewer casualties than Vietnam. They could have taken the capital(Hanoi) easily.Don Brunett (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Don Brunett BECAUSE YOU ARE A MAOIST BRAINWASHED. PLA USED HUMAN WAVE ATTACKS THEIR DOCTRINE NEVER LIKE THE USA AND YOU HAD BEEN SPREADING MAOISM TO YOUR HEAD BY CHINESE OVERSEAS AND 50CENTS ARMY. YOU ARE A BRAINWASHED COMMUNIST. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trannam.antitf (talk • contribs) 23:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
