Talk:Barony of Roslin
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
editThere maybe too many Caithnesses in this before they split???Harrypotter 21:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barony of Roslin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140624192556/http://fionamsinclair.co.uk/genealogy/Goshen/index.htm to http://fionamsinclair.co.uk/genealogy/Goshen/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Relative of WIlliam the Conqueror
editNo such relationship existed; William had no such first cousin. He had no aunt, either on maternal or paternal side, who married a Saint Clair. Demanding that I find a source to disprove something that was made up in the first place puts the burden of proof on the wrong foot. There is absolutely no basis in actual history, and a self-published web page that has clearly made it up is not a WP:RS. Agricolae (talk) 22:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)