Talk:Barnes Run

A fact from Barnes Run appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in the early 1900s, Barnes Run and Wolffs Run made up 25 percent of the water supply of Hazleton, Pennsylvania?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barnes Run.

Wikipedia

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference formatting edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Jakec, I am confused by the rationale you gave in this revert. A newspaper is certainly a "work", as indicated in the documentation for {{citation}}: "work: Name of the source periodical...Aliases: journal, newspaper". Further, using the work parameter automatically italicizes the names of the newspapers, as can be seen from the version of the article with the newspaper titles listed in the work parameter. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

I guess you're technically right. I still don't think it really matters since the only thing that's different is the parameter name. --Jakob (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

No, there's also the COinS, see Template:Citation#COinS. That's why we would want to include the right thing in the right parameter. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barnes Run. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic