Talk:Barbed Wire (1927 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Military history: War films / World War I Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	War films task force
	World War I task force

Potential changes and a copyright issue edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a screenshot of the film that was uploaded as "Own Work" author Paramount Pictures, user"@Jamesfranklingresham" but that user name does not exist when hovered over. While it is possible Paramount Pictures uploaded the picture themselves it is questionable, and the user has no proof they are Paramount Pictures. Furthermore the screenshot was uploaded Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported. The film is approximately 95 years old, so it may be in the public domain and should be listed as such (more so the image for rules purposes) if it is. Otherwise, unless if the user is indeed Paramount pictures it violates Wikipedia rules (it is arguably fair use but fair use images are not allowed on Wikipedia). More simply, if the image is public domain it should be listed as such, if it is not it may be breaking copyright law, or Wikipedia rules.

Additionally, with the information on the top right, there is 0 citations.

"including most importantly the insertion of a happy ending.[2]" most importantly implies that is the most important change which is subjective and biased.

All the links in the citations work, though there are two paywalls, one a book, the other a magazine so checking them is problematic. — ~~~~ Publicduck (talk) 19:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic