Talk:Badr bin Abdulaziz Al Saud

Fair use rationale for Image:Saudi-logo.jpg edit

 

Image:Saudi-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Badr bin Abdulaziz Al Saud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Abdul Elah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Badr bin Abdulaziz Al Saud edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Badr bin Abdulaziz Al Saud's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "spr":

  • From Majid bin Abdulaziz Al Saud: "Appendix 6. The Sons of Abdulaziz" (PDF). Springer. p. 179. Retrieved 13 August 2020.
  • From Haya bint Abdulaziz: "Appendix 6. The Sons of Abdulaziz" (PDF). Springer. p. 179. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  • From Abdul Muhsin bin Abdulaziz Al Saud: "Appendix 6. The Sons of Abdulaziz" (PDF). Springer. Retrieved 13 August 2020.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 09:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)Reply