Talk:Badluram ka Badan
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Yoninah in topic Badluram ka Badan
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
 | A fact from Badluram ka Badan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Comments edit
@Zwerubae: I wanted to expand this article for the purpose of a DYK. Should the title of this article "Badlu Ram Ka Badan" be left as it is or shifted to "Badluram ka Badan" ..... please note the small and capital letters too. DTM (talk) 13:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
@DiplomatTesterMan: I think the title should read "Badluram ka Badan." The official PIB source and adgpi twitter both say Badluram ka Badan. The second 'B' in capitals like in Sare Jahan se Accha. Zwerubae (talk) 14:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Badluram ka Badan edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Badluram's body is buried yet we get his rations? Source: "Badlu Ram ka badan zamin ke nichey hain ... Badlu Ram's body is now buried ... Toh humein uska ration milta hain ... Yet we continue to eat rations drawn in his name"
- ALT1:... that "Badluram's body" has been sung jointly by American and Indian soldiers? Source: When US soldiers sang and danced to Badluram ka badan with Indian armymen
- Reviewed: Kalavati Devi
5x expanded by DiplomatTesterMan (talk). Self-nominated at 09:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC).
A very fascinating article here. Article has been expanded 5x in the last 7 days, is long enough at 3,000 odd characters. Main hook is good and interesting, less than 200 chars, but I'd like a second opinion on that. I've checked, QPQ is accounted for, everything on the page is sourced adequately. Overall it is good to go from my end, but I'd like a second opinion on the main hook. ALT1 is a bit boring in my opinion. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
