Talk:BMW M54

Engine Output Discrepancy - Torque figures?

The Euro spec says 256 kw, 365Nm torque (269 ft lb) The CSL spec says 265kw, 360Nm torque (270 ft lb)

How can one have more Newton/Meters of torque (365Nm vs 360Nm), but less foot-pounds of torque than the other (269ft lb vs 270ft lb)? They are two different units of measurement for the performance characteristic.

I think there is some discrepancy in the unit conversion from one of the sources, but I haven't looked into it.

Separate Page for S54

Hi,

I really think the S54B32-part should be broken off to it's own page, since it is totally different engine and totally different development cycle from the M54 (the only commonality happens to be that both have the numbers 54 after the first letter.) There are tons of stuff I could write on the S54B32, but I think it should have it's own page first. Even more as the S54B32 is still alive and being used on new cars, but the M54 is not...

Best regards,

Jussi Jk-bmw 07:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps a link to this press release... http://www.users.fast.net/~slafredo/cars/bmw/E46_M3/press_release.html

It discusses the S54B32 in lots of detail

Specific Output

Someone put this as the second-highest production vehicle specific output: The Honda S2000, the reigning champion, has 90kW/Litre, the Porsche 911 GT3 RS comes in a close second at 85kW/Litre, and the S54B32 comes in at a dismal 79kW/Litre.

DOES ANYONE NOTICE THE HP/TQ SPECS ARE CONFLICTING FOR THE 3.0L BETWEEN THE GRAPH AT THE TOP AND ESSAY AT THE BOTTOM? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.119.49.170 (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

M54B30 Discrepancies

I was just going through my reference material for the North American 330Ci, and I noticed a few discrepancies between this article and the reference material.

According to both the Factory Service Manual and Bentley's E46 Service Manual, the M54B30 does not use forged, fractured-cap connecting rods; only the S54 engine does. The M54 uses conventional forged connecting rods.

Also, both those manuals (as well as the owner's manual provided by BMW) refer to the engine producing 225 bhp @ 5900 RPM and 214 ft-lb. @ 3500 RPM. While this difference could reflect regional variations in in both measurement and emissions controls, the distinction should be made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.144.193.169 (talk) 23:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned references in BMW M54

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of BMW M54's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "usautoparts":

• From BMW M40: Roy McNeill, Copyright BMW World 1999-2005. "BMW World - 4-Cylinder Engines". Usautoparts.net. Retrieved 2012-05-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
• From BMW S38: http://www.usautoparts.net/bmw/engines/s38.htm
• From BMW M10: Roy McNeill, Copyright BMW World 1999-2005. "BMW World - M10 Engine". Usautoparts.net. Retrieved 2012-05-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
• From BMW M43: http://www.usautoparts.net/bmw/engines/4cyl.htm
• From VANOS: USautoparts. "VANOS". Retrieved 11 May 2013.
• From BMW M60: http://www.usautoparts.net/bmw/engines/m60.htm
• From BMW 3 Series (E46): "BMW M3 Parts CSL". US auto parts. Retrieved 2009-07-10.
• From BMW M62: http://www.usautoparts.net/bmw/engines/m62.htm

Reference named "carpages":

• From BMW M3: "The New M3 CSL", Car pages
• From BMW 3 Series (E46): "The New M3 CSL". Car pages. Retrieved 2009-07-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

ZHP stats?

Is there a particular reason that the engine from the US-only ZHP is not listed among the versions of the engine, as it does have different power figures and a higher redline? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.241.122.68 (talk) 20:21, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BMW M54. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120621050752/http://www.usautoparts.net:80/bmw/engines/m54.htm to http://www.usautoparts.net/bmw/engines/m54.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Power units

Hello Mr.choppers. Just a courtesy ping, in case you take issue with my latest "anti-metric hp edits" here. The reason for removing Pferdstarke is that I do not believe it is closely linked with vehicles using this engine, and it isn't necessary for verifying the references here. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)