Talk:Authenticity of the Testimonium Flavianum
Latest comment: 12 years ago by History2007 in topic Please give reasons
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Authenticity of the Testimonium Flavianum redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Please give reasons
editPlease give reasons why scholars do not believe the Testimonium Flavianum to be authentic, rather than saying they are all mistaken. Lung salad (talk) 21:20, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- There are two pretty long sections (not written by me) that give pro and con discussions. Those are some of the reasons on either sides - obviously. History2007 (talk) 00:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I have seen how it's been written. [1]Lung salad (talk) 09:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- You might want to actually look at how the article is being written Lung rather than simply trying to project into the article as it lists for and [[2]] the authenticity. Considering this that the Josephus on Jesus article also has a portion in which the authenticity is pointedly disputed and their are arguments found here that are not in that, I think it might be worthwhile to discuss a merger rather than simply trying to dispute the neutrality of the article. Reason and Logic shall always prevail (talk) 23:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- FYI: User Lung salad was indef-blocked. History2007 (talk) 00:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)